Skip over main navigation
  • Log in
  • Basket: (0 items)
(IPSEA) Independent Provider of Special Education Advice
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Donate
Menu
  • Home
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Our impact
    • Our vision and goals
    • Work for us
    • Annual report
  • How we help
    • Get support
    • Our services
    • Policy work
    • Services for professionals
    • Case studies
  • Training
    • Learn about and book training
    • Upcoming training events
    • Online training
    • Face to face training
    • Bespoke training
    • Training FAQs
    • Webinars
    • Legal updates
    • Testimonials
  • Get involved
    • Why funds are necessary
    • Donate
    • Fundraising
    • Other ways to give
      • Online shopping
      • Gifts in your will
      • Gifts in memory
      • Gifts in celebration
    • Volunteer
    • Corporate support
    • Trusts and foundations
  • Latest
    • News
    • IPSEA Blogs
  • Contact
    • Contact us
    • Press enquiries
  • IPSEA Legal Resources Portal
  • Admin
    • Log in
  • Basket: (0 items)
  • Mental capacity and decision making
  1. How we help
  2. Get support
  3. Young people (aged 16-25)
  4. Mental capacity and decision making

Mental capacity and decision making

Under the Children and Families Act 2014, a child will become a young person once they reach the end of compulsory school age (i.e. the last Friday of June in the year the child turns 16). At that point parental rights under the law in relation to the young person's education will automatically pass to the young person themselves.

Involvement of parents

The SEN and Disability Code of Practice 2015 (“the Code”) makes it clear that once a child becomes a young person at the age of 16, local authorities and others should normally engage directly with the young person rather than their parents. However, the Code also makes it clear that the young person's family and parents should continue to be involved in discussions about the young person's future. The young person may also ask them to help in other ways such as attending meetings, filling in forms or receiving correspondence on their behalf. This is particularly important for 16 and 17 year olds, for whom parents will retain parental responsibility until they reach the age of 18.

The concept of ‘mental capacity’

The legal concept of mental capacity is contained in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice, which is statutory guidance.

Mental capacity is assessed in relation to the particular decision which needs to be made. This means that whether a young person has mental capacity to make a particular decision or not has to be considered on an individual basis in the light of the circumstances at the time. You cannot just say that someone lacks mental capacity generally. For example, whilst a young person may be able to make daily decisions, such as what choice of dinner they want or things they would like to learn about, they may not be capable of deciding what school or college they want to attend. If a young person lacks the capacity to make a particular decision, then someone else (usually their parent) will be able to make that decision for them.

A person must be assumed to have capacity unless there is evidence that they are not able to make the relevant decision. Someone is treated as being unable to make a decision if they are not able:

  • to understand the information relevant to the decision,
  • to retain that information,
  • to use or weigh that information as part of the process of making the decision, or
  • to communicate their decision (whether by talking, using sign language or any other means).

Before concluding that a young person is unable to make a decision, all practicable steps should be taken to help them make the decision without success. Importantly, the Mental Capacity Act is clear that a person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision merely because they make an unwise decision.

If a young person lacks capacity to make a particular decision, the person making the decision on their behalf must act in the young person’s best interests.

Agreement

The decision as to whether a young person has mental capacity to make a particular decision is something that they and their parents should make in the first instance. It would be very rare for a school or college or LA not to agree with their assessment of the situation.

When it is agreed that a young person does not have capacity to make a decision about appropriate education needs, then parents will automatically make that decision for them unless the Court of Protection has appointed a different person to be their Deputy. They would have to make the decision which was in the best interests of the young person concerned. The local authority would also still have to seek the young person's views as part of any decision-making process.

Disagreement

There may be disagreement between the parents, the young person, the school or college being attended, and/or the local authority, regarding a young person's mental capacity to make a decision. It may then be necessary to seek an assessment to provide a professional opinion of the young person's capacity to make the decision.

The Mental Capacity Code of Practice confirms that this opinion could come from a psychiatrist, psychologist, speech and language therapist, occupational therapist or social worker. It might also come from someone like a GP or other medical professional who is involved with the young person. It is very important that such assessments are done by professionals who have acquired the necessary skills. A decision on a young person's mental capacity should not be made by a school/college or local authority.

A mental capacity assessment might be helpful to support a parent who wished to take a decision on behalf of a young person and was being challenged by a local authority about their right to do so. A parent would be expected to explain the basis of their belief that the young person lacked capacity and an assessment might help them to do so. Such an assessment may not be necessary in all cases, depending on the other evidence available to support the parent's belief.

Published: 11th April, 2018

Updated: 1st May, 2018

Author: Emma Brock

Related topics:
  • Young people (aged 16-25)
Share this page
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Latest

  • Appeals against a refusal to issue an EHC plan

    Appeals against a refusal to issue an EHC plan

    Refusal to issue appeals

  • IPSEA Level 2 SEND Law Training - 6 April

    IPSEA Level 2 SEND Law Training - 6 April

    Our Level 2 SEND law training looks in-depth at specific areas of the law relating to children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

  • SEND Tribunal hints and tips 23 March

    SEND Tribunal hints and tips 23 March

    This training day is suitable for those currently going through the following appeals processes: appeals against the contents of an EHC plan and appeals against the school named in the plan

  • Support IPSEA

    Any donation you make is hugely appreciated, and helps to keep our vital advice and support services running

Related

  • Are you a young person?

    Are you a young person?

    As a young person under the Children and Families Act 2014, you have more say about your education and your parents have less say

  • Are you the parent or carer of a young person?

    Are you the parent or carer of a young person?

    Under the Children and Families Act 2014, certain rights and decisions transfer from parents (or carers) to young people

Most read

  • EHC needs assessments

    EHC needs assessments

    An EHC needs assessment is an assessment of a child or young person’s education, health and care needs

  • Asking for an EHC needs assessment

    Asking for an EHC needs assessment

  • Advice Line

    Advice Line

    Our Advice Line provides legally based information and next step advice on any educational issue that is the result of a child’s special educational needs or disability

  • Model letters

    Model letters

    IPSEA model letters are available to download and amend for your own purposes

  • Making a request for an EHC needs assessment: Model letter 1

    Making a request for an EHC needs assessment: Model letter 1

  • Contact us

    Contact us

  • What happens in an EHC needs assessment

    What happens in an EHC needs assessment

  • Appealing to the SEND Tribunal

    Appealing to the SEND Tribunal

    The SEND Tribunal is an independent national tribunal which hears parents’ and young people’s appeals against LA decisions about the special educational needs of children and young people

  • IPSEA update on COVID-19 and SEN provision

    IPSEA update on COVID-19 and SEN provision

    Read our guidance on the how the COVID-19 measures affect children and young people with special educational needs (SEN)

  • What an EHC plan contains

    What an EHC plan contains

    An EHC plan should be written in a way that makes it clear, to parents, young people, schools, colleges and LAs, who is required to do what, when it has to happen and how often it should be reviewed

How you can help IPSEA

How you can help IPSEA

Have you found the information on our website helpful today? If so, please consider donating! At IPSEA, we rely on your donations and fundraising efforts to help keep our vital services running. Read more

Donate Fundraise

Published: 19th March, 2014

Updated: 11th March, 2020

Author:

Sign up to receive regular email updates from IPSEA

The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • My details
  • Log out

IPSEA is registered charity number 327691
Limited company 2198066

Registered office: IPSEA, 24-26 Gold Street, Saffron Walden, CB10 1EJ